Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27051 - 27060 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 27051 - 27060 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Cornelius R. Reed
With respect to the “prejudice” component of the test for ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4561 - 2005-03-31
With respect to the “prejudice” component of the test for ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4561 - 2005-03-31
Douglas W. Olen v. Frank K. Phelps
. v. Ghingher, 411 A.2d 430, 436 (Md. 1980). We adopt the generally accepted test stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7738 - 2005-03-31
. v. Ghingher, 411 A.2d 430, 436 (Md. 1980). We adopt the generally accepted test stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7738 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). “The legal determination of reasonable suspicion is an objective test: ‘What would a reasonable police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
). “The legal determination of reasonable suspicion is an objective test: ‘What would a reasonable police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
State v. Billy D. Evans
a reasonable person test: if a reasonable person would have believed he was not free to leave, then a seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12859 - 2005-03-31
a reasonable person test: if a reasonable person would have believed he was not free to leave, then a seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12859 - 2005-03-31
State v. Xavier B. Smith
of crack cocaine; testing later verified this assessment. Libal and his fellow officers then entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21024 - 2006-01-23
of crack cocaine; testing later verified this assessment. Libal and his fellow officers then entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21024 - 2006-01-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
, ¶¶30-31, 247 Wis. 2d 466, 634 N.W.2d 325. “The test for determining if there has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30621 - 2014-09-15
, ¶¶30-31, 247 Wis. 2d 466, 634 N.W.2d 325. “The test for determining if there has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30621 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Arch L. H.
minimus.” Id. at 541-42, 370 N.W.2d at 231. The test is “whether there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11256 - 2017-09-19
minimus.” Id. at 541-42, 370 N.W.2d at 231. The test is “whether there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11256 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The five-prong Pulizzano2 test requires a defendant to show: (1) that the prior acts clearly occurred; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76501 - 2014-09-15
). The five-prong Pulizzano2 test requires a defendant to show: (1) that the prior acts clearly occurred; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76501 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193273 - 2017-09-21
prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193273 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
We employ a common sense test to determine whether an investigative traffic stop was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41714 - 2009-09-30
We employ a common sense test to determine whether an investigative traffic stop was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41714 - 2009-09-30