Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27061 - 27070 of 30177 for de.

State v. Matthew Polster
prejudiced the defense are questions of law, which we decide de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21512 - 2006-02-22

Douglas Scott Geen v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of deference: great weight, due weight, or de novo. American Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hernandez, 2002 WI App 76
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4475 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Hal Hempel v. City of Baraboo
as applied to undisputed facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See Mayfair Chrysler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6194 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792486 - 2024-04-24

[PDF] Jim Smith v. Tracy Williams
6 interpretation, a question of law, which we review de novo. CSO Servicing Corp. v. City of Eau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3393 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI 121
the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. Id. Finally, No. 2009AP1529-D 16
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55548 - 2014-09-15

Thomas R. Ward v. Town of Nashville
. Thompson, 155 Wis. 2d 442, 444, 455 N.W.2d 268 (Ct. App. 1990) (implicitly applying de novo review to issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2481 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ted W. Urdahl
reviews de novo, while accepting any findings of fact made by the circuit court unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19002 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Willie Hogan
. Schmidt v. Wisconsin, 521 U.S. 1118. Our review is de novo. State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 301, 541
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3283 - 2017-09-19

Opinion-SC
review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. Id. Finally, where misconduct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55548 - 2010-10-13