Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27061 - 27070 of 40067 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
fails to explain Valdez’s own statement at the plea hearing in which he assured the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246276 - 2019-09-11

[PDF] State v. Delmar A. Kreier
to testify to Schneider’s reputation as a liar, burglar, and thief and to exculpatory statements he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4356 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Raymond Ludwikowski v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
. Fleeson's report is most fairly characterized as a statement that he is skeptical of Ludwikowski's self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9421 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
a mistake in the judgment of dismissal acquittal, and as per the statement of negotiated plea, the theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34044 - 2008-09-15

[PDF] State v. Carl J. Knapp
). Knapp also argues that certain other statements in the report were erroneous or improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9262 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
the facts as if restating closing arguments. In this regard, we cite a statement in a case written over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31728 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Shawn D. Knapp
court was concerned about Knapp's statement to a psychologist reported in the Presentence Investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7751 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
of the Williamses’ photograph exhibits the statement appears that the Williamses’ wooden fence “was put in exactly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26926 - 2006-10-25

State v. James D. Luedtke
statements did not constitute a fair and just reason for withdrawal. Luedtke has failed to adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10779 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. That didn’t mean it couldn’t have happened.” Defense counsel did not object to the prosecutor’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35708 - 2009-03-03