Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27061 - 27070 of 69007 for had.

COURT OF APPEALS
, hashish, and three pink pills. ¶3 The informant, who had provided truthful and reliable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91561 - 2013-01-14

Security State Bank v. Dale J. Sechen
that the Sechens had a right to redeem the property prior to the confirmation. Therefore, we reverse the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19919 - 2005-12-11

[PDF] State v. James E. Sterling
. The officer suspected that Sterling was intoxicated and had him perform several field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12117 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
WIS. STAT. § 48.981(3)(c)4. Barker had the opportunity, but he did not request an agency review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252108 - 2020-01-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court asked him whether he had reviewed the elements of the charges with his attorney, and Eibl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215697 - 2018-07-17

CA Blank Order
also contends that Spitzer had no cause of action in the absence of damage to Pugh. Azarian appears
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123596 - 2014-10-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that involved multiple controlled buys of heroin and cocaine. At the time of his arrest, Lyons had cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=769890 - 2024-03-05

Paula L. Moebius v. General Casualty Insurance Co.
attempt to discredit Futch with testimony from its chiropractor expert that Futch had a reputation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9998 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
that, once the police had opened the bathroom and bedroom doors, “without further guidance, the officers had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27417 - 2006-12-13

Sylvester Rakowski v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Company
, Milwaukee Mutual filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis that the statute of limitations had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9734 - 2005-03-31