Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27061 - 27070 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 27061 - 27070 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
County of Dane v. John S. McKenzie
] He claims the County did not establish that the blood test result admitted at trial was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2498 - 2005-03-31
] He claims the County did not establish that the blood test result admitted at trial was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2498 - 2005-03-31
County of Dane v. John S. McKenzie
] He claims the County did not establish that the blood test result admitted at trial was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2497 - 2005-03-31
] He claims the County did not establish that the blood test result admitted at trial was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2497 - 2005-03-31
Selgren Development Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
condemnation action against the DOT under § 32.10, Stats., in which Selgren claimed that its real estate “has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11720 - 2005-03-31
condemnation action against the DOT under § 32.10, Stats., in which Selgren claimed that its real estate “has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11720 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that there had been no judicial consideration of the merits and claimed it had a meritorious defense which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98324 - 2013-06-19
that there had been no judicial consideration of the merits and claimed it had a meritorious defense which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98324 - 2013-06-19
State v. Frances Nienhardt
must decide, in light of the entire facts and circumstances, whether the claimed error is sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8285 - 2005-03-31
must decide, in light of the entire facts and circumstances, whether the claimed error is sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8285 - 2005-03-31
State v. David W. Stokes
was not working. Posttrial, Stokes claimed the machine probably was functioning and that evidence to that effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7897 - 2005-03-31
was not working. Posttrial, Stokes claimed the machine probably was functioning and that evidence to that effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7897 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark H. Gabriel
an officer. Gabriel appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 Gabriel’s first claim is that there was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20531 - 2017-09-21
an officer. Gabriel appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 Gabriel’s first claim is that there was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20531 - 2017-09-21
Rawson Contractors, Inc. v. Lisbon Sanitary District No. 1
. Rawson also claimed that it was entitled to the additional $2 per lineal foot because the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7911 - 2005-03-31
. Rawson also claimed that it was entitled to the additional $2 per lineal foot because the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We reject Barnes’s claim that the trial court erred by declining to send the physical evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116671 - 2017-09-21
. We reject Barnes’s claim that the trial court erred by declining to send the physical evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116671 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶4 Gorokhovsky claims that he was denied constitutional due process rights because (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70326 - 2014-09-15
¶4 Gorokhovsky claims that he was denied constitutional due process rights because (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70326 - 2014-09-15