Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27071 - 27080 of 29828 for des.
Search results 27071 - 27080 of 29828 for des.
John L. Gorton v. Hostak
. This case presents questions of statutory and contract interpretation. We review such questions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17159 - 2005-03-31
. This case presents questions of statutory and contract interpretation. We review such questions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17159 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven A. Avery
of newly-discovered evidence is a constitutional question which we review de novo. See Bembenek, 140 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11594 - 2005-03-31
of newly-discovered evidence is a constitutional question which we review de novo. See Bembenek, 140 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11594 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ted W. Urdahl
right to a speedy trial presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo, while accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19002 - 2005-08-30
right to a speedy trial presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo, while accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19002 - 2005-08-30
State v. Matthew Polster
prejudiced the defense are questions of law, which we decide de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21512 - 2006-02-22
prejudiced the defense are questions of law, which we decide de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21512 - 2006-02-22
State v. Thomas W. Koeppen
conviction must be a direct and specific admission by the defendant). We apply a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15136 - 2005-03-31
conviction must be a direct and specific admission by the defendant). We apply a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15136 - 2005-03-31
Elmer W. Glaeske v. Elwyn M. Shaw
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Wisconsin Chiropractic Ass’n, 269 Wis. 2d 837, ¶20. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6918 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Wisconsin Chiropractic Ass’n, 269 Wis. 2d 837, ¶20. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6918 - 2005-03-31
State v. Antonio A. Scott
of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299, 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14300 - 2005-03-31
of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299, 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14300 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 349 Wis. 2d 148, 833 N.W.2d 607. We review de novo, however, whether the statutory standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=911594 - 2025-02-12
, 349 Wis. 2d 148, 833 N.W.2d 607. We review de novo, however, whether the statutory standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=911594 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recognition protocol conducted by Knutson and officer Bagley, a drug recognition expert from the De Pere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210358 - 2018-03-27
recognition protocol conducted by Knutson and officer Bagley, a drug recognition expert from the De Pere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210358 - 2018-03-27
[PDF]
WI App 46
to engage in statutory interpretation, which is a matter of law we review de novo. See Noffke ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372104 - 2021-08-19
to engage in statutory interpretation, which is a matter of law we review de novo. See Noffke ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372104 - 2021-08-19