Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27081 - 27090 of 29713 for des.
Search results 27081 - 27090 of 29713 for des.
Frontsheet
are interrelated: (1) the majority's analysis has not adhered to the proper de novo standard of review; (2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99360 - 2014-01-08
are interrelated: (1) the majority's analysis has not adhered to the proper de novo standard of review; (2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99360 - 2014-01-08
[PDF]
Tatum Smaxwell v. Melva Bayard
the material facts are not disputed, the court is presented solely with a question of law, subject to de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16713 - 2017-09-21
the material facts are not disputed, the court is presented solely with a question of law, subject to de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16713 - 2017-09-21
Dodgeland Education Association v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
to "due weight" or "great bearing." The lowest level of review, the de novo standard, is applied where
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16352 - 2005-03-31
to "due weight" or "great bearing." The lowest level of review, the de novo standard, is applied where
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16352 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
immunity: Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Mallow v. Angove, 148 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33425 - 2008-07-15
immunity: Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Mallow v. Angove, 148 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33425 - 2008-07-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
double jeopardy has been violated presents a question of law that we review de novo." State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191931 - 2017-09-21
double jeopardy has been violated presents a question of law that we review de novo." State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191931 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Charles Stehlik v. Paul Rhoads
the postverdict motions de novo because it presents a question
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17586 - 2017-09-21
the postverdict motions de novo because it presents a question
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17586 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Martha E. Derr v. Michael J. Derr
, this presents a question of law which we review de novo. Popp, 146 Wis. 2d at 788 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6770 - 2017-09-20
, this presents a question of law which we review de novo. Popp, 146 Wis. 2d at 788 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6770 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jason Phillips
review de novo, or grant deference to, the circuit court’s finding that the defendant voluntarily
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17065 - 2005-03-31
review de novo, or grant deference to, the circuit court’s finding that the defendant voluntarily
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17065 - 2005-03-31
Charles Stehlik v. Paul Rhoads
the circuit court's decision regarding the postverdict motions de novo because it presents a question of law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17586 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court's decision regarding the postverdict motions de novo because it presents a question of law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17586 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 71
N.W.2d 166. We review questions of agency authority de novo. Andersen v. DNR, 2011 WI 19, ¶¶25-26
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=386188 - 2021-09-14
N.W.2d 166. We review questions of agency authority de novo. Andersen v. DNR, 2011 WI 19, ¶¶25-26
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=386188 - 2021-09-14