Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27081 - 27090 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 27081 - 27090 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Alexander Dejesus
of possession of marijuana, contrary to § 161.41(3r), STATS.1 Dejesus pleaded no contest after the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9707 - 2017-09-19
of possession of marijuana, contrary to § 161.41(3r), STATS.1 Dejesus pleaded no contest after the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9707 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
joined for trial and the court erroneously No. 2013AP1929-CR 2 exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115665 - 2017-09-21
joined for trial and the court erroneously No. 2013AP1929-CR 2 exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115665 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Delynn A. Streit
)(a). In the trial court, 1 This opinion is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2674 - 2017-09-19
)(a). In the trial court, 1 This opinion is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2674 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report concluding there is no basis to challenge Rogstad’s conviction, following a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261849 - 2020-05-27
a no-merit report concluding there is no basis to challenge Rogstad’s conviction, following a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261849 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
Chromium Industries, Inc. v. Milwaukee Boiler Manufacturing Company
of four industrial rolls for Chromium. Milwaukee Boiler contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9648 - 2017-09-19
of four industrial rolls for Chromium. Milwaukee Boiler contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9648 - 2017-09-19
Tony Schroeckenthaler v. Roger Philbrick
of the two small claims actions and a demand for a trial de novo. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6463 - 2005-03-31
of the two small claims actions and a demand for a trial de novo. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6463 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an appellate court reviews an order denying a motion to suppress evidence, it will uphold the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31601 - 2008-01-22
an appellate court reviews an order denying a motion to suppress evidence, it will uphold the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31601 - 2008-01-22
Roger Philbrick v. Tony Schroeckenthaler
of the two small claims actions and a demand for a trial de novo. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6464 - 2005-03-31
of the two small claims actions and a demand for a trial de novo. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6464 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial court’s instructions, “the jury would have reasonably understood that they were required to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32752 - 2008-05-19
of the trial court’s instructions, “the jury would have reasonably understood that they were required to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32752 - 2008-05-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
1 The trial court informally consolidated the two underlying cases for purposes of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36676 - 2014-09-15
1 The trial court informally consolidated the two underlying cases for purposes of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36676 - 2014-09-15