Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27081 - 27090 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 27081 - 27090 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Tony Schroeckenthaler v. Roger Philbrick
of the two small claims actions and a demand for a trial de novo. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6463 - 2005-03-31
of the two small claims actions and a demand for a trial de novo. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6463 - 2005-03-31
Edwin Tallard v. Northern States Power Company
. Both sides initially moved for summary judgment, but later stipulated that the trial court could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12263 - 2005-03-31
. Both sides initially moved for summary judgment, but later stipulated that the trial court could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12263 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an appellate court reviews an order denying a motion to suppress evidence, it will uphold the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31601 - 2008-01-22
an appellate court reviews an order denying a motion to suppress evidence, it will uphold the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31601 - 2008-01-22
Roger Philbrick v. Tony Schroeckenthaler
of the two small claims actions and a demand for a trial de novo. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6464 - 2005-03-31
of the two small claims actions and a demand for a trial de novo. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6464 - 2005-03-31
Darryl B. Jaraczewski v. Krueger International, Inc.
, particularly when the contract forbids modification by agents; (2) the trial court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7091 - 2005-03-31
, particularly when the contract forbids modification by agents; (2) the trial court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7091 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
), and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Burnside argues that: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111137 - 2014-04-28
), and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Burnside argues that: (1) the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111137 - 2014-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial court’s instructions, “the jury would have reasonably understood that they were required to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32752 - 2008-05-19
of the trial court’s instructions, “the jury would have reasonably understood that they were required to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32752 - 2008-05-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
1 The trial court informally consolidated the two underlying cases for purposes of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36676 - 2014-09-15
1 The trial court informally consolidated the two underlying cases for purposes of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36676 - 2014-09-15
State v. Paul Matek
ch. 980, Stats., which was used at his trial does not adequately state the law because it does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11818 - 2005-03-31
ch. 980, Stats., which was used at his trial does not adequately state the law because it does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11818 - 2005-03-31
State v. Taurius S. Fluker
), as an habitual criminal, see Wis. Stat. § 939.62, and from the trial court’s order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7463 - 2005-03-31
), as an habitual criminal, see Wis. Stat. § 939.62, and from the trial court’s order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7463 - 2005-03-31