Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27091 - 27100 of 29823 for des.
Search results 27091 - 27100 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72447 - 2014-09-15
agreement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72447 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler and Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2, 351 Wis. 2d 123, 839 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204650 - 2017-12-11
judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler and Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2, 351 Wis. 2d 123, 839 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204650 - 2017-12-11
10AP466 City of Mequon v. James E. Haynor
of erroneous [exercise of] judicial discretion de novo.” Actually, Martindale establishes that a reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54057 - 2010-09-07
of erroneous [exercise of] judicial discretion de novo.” Actually, Martindale establishes that a reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54057 - 2010-09-07
[PDF]
WI APP 22
63, ¶13, 317 Wis. 2d 734, 767 N.W.2d 343. ¶16 Our review of the Board’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630355 - 2023-05-23
63, ¶13, 317 Wis. 2d 734, 767 N.W.2d 343. ¶16 Our review of the Board’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630355 - 2023-05-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then apply the law to those facts de novo. Id. ¶27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526870 - 2022-06-01
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then apply the law to those facts de novo. Id. ¶27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526870 - 2022-06-01
State v. Bart C. Gruetzmacher
review de novo. State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. See also State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16689 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. See also State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16689 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 121
the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. Id. Finally, No. 2009AP1529-D 16
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55548 - 2014-09-15
the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. Id. Finally, No. 2009AP1529-D 16
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55548 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Carla S. v. Frank B.
is a question of law that we review de novo. Wisconsin Hosp. Ass’n v. Natural Res. Bd., 156 Wis. 2d 688, 700
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16214 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. Wisconsin Hosp. Ass’n v. Natural Res. Bd., 156 Wis. 2d 688, 700
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16214 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and conviction on the lesser offense. See id., ¶7. Our review as to whether this test is satisfied is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138606 - 2017-09-21
and conviction on the lesser offense. See id., ¶7. Our review as to whether this test is satisfied is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138606 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Miller Carroll
not grant deference to the referee's conclusions of law and reviews them on a de novo basis. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16389 - 2017-09-21
not grant deference to the referee's conclusions of law and reviews them on a de novo basis. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16389 - 2017-09-21