Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27091 - 27100 of 68921 for he.
Search results 27091 - 27100 of 68921 for he.
State v. Brian J. Buffum
an individual if he or she possesses a suspicion grounded in specific, articulable facts and reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11548 - 2005-03-31
an individual if he or she possesses a suspicion grounded in specific, articulable facts and reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11548 - 2005-03-31
Albert Winfrey v. Gordon A. Abrahamson
to Schueler why he had approached the inmate. Winfrey stopped behind Schueler and wanted to continue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8029 - 2005-03-31
to Schueler why he had approached the inmate. Winfrey stopped behind Schueler and wanted to continue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8029 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas G. Worzella
severe and remarkably active and even violent reactions to low sugars.” Finally, Dr. Dixon said he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5583 - 2017-09-19
severe and remarkably active and even violent reactions to low sugars.” Finally, Dr. Dixon said he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5583 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark E. Hanson
while intoxicated, second offense. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25726 - 2017-09-21
while intoxicated, second offense. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25726 - 2017-09-21
State v. Childeric Maxy
of intoxication defense. However, he provides no reason to believe additional blood testing would have found some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17841 - 2005-05-02
of intoxication defense. However, he provides no reason to believe additional blood testing would have found some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17841 - 2005-05-02
State v. David W. Pender
evidence of the primary evidentiary test used to establish his blood alcohol level because he was not given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12582 - 2005-03-31
evidence of the primary evidentiary test used to establish his blood alcohol level because he was not given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12582 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and that he was not competent to refuse medication. The court thus extended William’s mental commitment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101476 - 2017-09-21
, and that he was not competent to refuse medication. The court thus extended William’s mental commitment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101476 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration, alleging that he “mention[ed] the issue” to appointed counsel who failed to pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29839 - 2007-07-30
for reconsideration, alleging that he “mention[ed] the issue” to appointed counsel who failed to pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29839 - 2007-07-30
[PDF]
Robert Keith v. Joshuah C. Harner
that the trial court erred in construing the “strict compliance” clause of § 893.82(2m). 2 He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7274 - 2017-09-20
that the trial court erred in construing the “strict compliance” clause of § 893.82(2m). 2 He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7274 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to pursue postconviction relief from his underlying conviction. Instead, several months later, he filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747296 - 2024-01-05
to pursue postconviction relief from his underlying conviction. Instead, several months later, he filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747296 - 2024-01-05