Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27091 - 27100 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 27091 - 27100 of 58510 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the presentence investigation report (PSI) prior to her sentencing. She also argues her trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262706 - 2020-06-02
of the presentence investigation report (PSI) prior to her sentencing. She also argues her trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262706 - 2020-06-02
B.N. v. Guy N. Giese
, the trial court ruled that Joann’s conduct was intentional and therefore excluded from coverage under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6717 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court ruled that Joann’s conduct was intentional and therefore excluded from coverage under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6717 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
an order denying her postconviction motion for a new trial. We affirm the judgment and the order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48055 - 2014-09-15
an order denying her postconviction motion for a new trial. We affirm the judgment and the order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48055 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mitchel L. Schanke
; therefore, the stop was illegal and the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13749 - 2005-03-31
; therefore, the stop was illegal and the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13749 - 2005-03-31
State v. Guy N. Giese
of whether “other acts” evidence is admissible is a matter within the trial court’s discretion. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10925 - 2005-03-31
of whether “other acts” evidence is admissible is a matter within the trial court’s discretion. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10925 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647943 - 2023-04-27
appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647943 - 2023-04-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of this criminal case three days before trial are understandable in light of the time pressures placed on circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=583013 - 2022-10-28
of this criminal case three days before trial are understandable in light of the time pressures placed on circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=583013 - 2022-10-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing where both Slack and his trial counsel testified. Afterward, the circuit court stated its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243956 - 2019-07-23
hearing where both Slack and his trial counsel testified. Afterward, the circuit court stated its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243956 - 2019-07-23
[PDF]
State v. Gerald D. Schrank
was arrested and charged with OWI and PAC. His theory of defense at the jury trial was that a person named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7001 - 2017-09-20
was arrested and charged with OWI and PAC. His theory of defense at the jury trial was that a person named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7001 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2013AP1293-CR 2 denying his motion for postconviction relief. Burnside argues that: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111137 - 2017-09-21
No. 2013AP1293-CR 2 denying his motion for postconviction relief. Burnside argues that: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111137 - 2017-09-21