Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2711 - 2720 of 4815 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Talun Blitar.
Search results 2711 - 2720 of 4815 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Talun Blitar.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
WISCONSIN STAT. § 346.65(2)(g) doubles, triples, or quadruples the minimum and maximum applicable fines
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644955 - 2023-04-18
WISCONSIN STAT. § 346.65(2)(g) doubles, triples, or quadruples the minimum and maximum applicable fines
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644955 - 2023-04-18
[PDF]
marked as parking stalls, and cross a double yellow line. ¶3 The officer initiated a traffic stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=743290 - 2023-12-21
marked as parking stalls, and cross a double yellow line. ¶3 The officer initiated a traffic stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=743290 - 2023-12-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
exist. ¶7 Double punishments. Gray and Felton contend that they were punished twice, first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49716 - 2014-09-15
exist. ¶7 Double punishments. Gray and Felton contend that they were punished twice, first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49716 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael S. Danforth
not dismiss a criminal prosecution with prejudice unless the defendant’s double jeopardy or speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7582 - 2005-03-31
not dismiss a criminal prosecution with prejudice unless the defendant’s double jeopardy or speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7582 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jackson D. Carpenter
, and that a remand for an evidentiary hearing on that issue would not violate his right to be free from double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15570 - 2017-09-21
, and that a remand for an evidentiary hearing on that issue would not violate his right to be free from double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15570 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for Jackson’s third offense were doubled due to his .17 blood alcohol concentration, and the minimum
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256696 - 2020-03-16
for Jackson’s third offense were doubled due to his .17 blood alcohol concentration, and the minimum
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256696 - 2020-03-16
[PDF]
State v. Jesus Serrano
and maximum periods of imprisonment” were “doubled.” Section 161.48(2), STATS. Therefore, Serrano, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9718 - 2017-09-19
and maximum periods of imprisonment” were “doubled.” Section 161.48(2), STATS. Therefore, Serrano, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9718 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Wis. 2d at 100. The Boettcher court held that double counting or “dual credit” for the same period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074454 - 2026-02-10
Wis. 2d at 100. The Boettcher court held that double counting or “dual credit” for the same period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074454 - 2026-02-10
[PDF]
State v. Julian C.P.
are not considered punishment for double jeopardy purposes). The State's argument that placement in a secure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7810 - 2017-09-19
are not considered punishment for double jeopardy purposes). The State's argument that placement in a secure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7810 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
dates. There was no double jeopardy violation, as explained in the supplemental no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218632 - 2018-09-05
dates. There was no double jeopardy violation, as explained in the supplemental no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218632 - 2018-09-05