Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2711 - 2720 of 83205 for case code.

[PDF] State v. Richard A. Devore
2004 WI App 87 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-2323-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6822 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
to WIS. ADMIN. CODE § TRANS 327.03(5). Sylvia’s contends that the trial court erred in denying its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4872 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
discern them. Rhoades’s statements of the case and the facts, sometimes supported by record citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110488 - 2017-09-21

Sheri Klein v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
2003 WI App 118 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-1927 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5486 - 2005-03-31

LMMIA, LLC v. State of Wisconsin, Division of Hearings and Appeals
., Dykman and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J. This case concerns the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25716 - 2006-06-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id., ¶26; see WIS. STAT. § 767.59(2)(a); WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DCF 150.03 (“The court shall determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83228 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] LMMIA, LLC v. State of Wisconsin, Division of Hearings and Appeals
. This case concerns the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) denial of LMMIA’s permit application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25716 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
discern them. Rhoades’s statements of the case and the facts, sometimes supported by record citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110488 - 2014-04-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the percentage standard to “gross income.” Id., ¶26; see Wis. Stat. § 767.59(2)(a); Wis. Admin. Code § DCF
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83228 - 2012-06-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a contract, statute, or administrative code is a question of law we review de novo. See Boelter v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173219 - 2017-09-21