Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2711 - 2720 of 20930 for word.
Search results 2711 - 2720 of 20930 for word.
State v. Rodolfo Garcia
in the express words of the statute. However, pursuant to State v. Chavez, 175 Wis. 2d 366, 498 N.W.2d 887 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15408 - 2005-03-31
in the express words of the statute. However, pursuant to State v. Chavez, 175 Wis. 2d 366, 498 N.W.2d 887 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15408 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
The word "shall," when used in a statute, is presumed to be mandatory unless another construction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16969 - 2005-03-31
The word "shall," when used in a statute, is presumed to be mandatory unless another construction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16969 - 2005-03-31
Anton F. Schorsch v. James Blader
will determine legislative intent from the words of the statute in relation to its context, subject matter, scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10752 - 2005-03-31
will determine legislative intent from the words of the statute in relation to its context, subject matter, scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10752 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“happening,” in Pruitt’s words, but not to the parts that make up that “happening.” Pruitt provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173799 - 2017-09-21
“happening,” in Pruitt’s words, but not to the parts that make up that “happening.” Pruitt provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173799 - 2017-09-21
Toumkham Rabideau v. Milan W. Stiller
the omission is called to the attention of the pleader or the movant.” (Emphasis added.) In other words, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25694 - 2006-07-25
the omission is called to the attention of the pleader or the movant.” (Emphasis added.) In other words, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25694 - 2006-07-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conduct charge, a lot of the same behaviors and words that the defendant used support this charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90233 - 2014-09-15
conduct charge, a lot of the same behaviors and words that the defendant used support this charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90233 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
] Securities Corporation Loan Trust 1997-2.” Davies implies that the erroneous repetition of the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141776 - 2017-09-21
] Securities Corporation Loan Trust 1997-2.” Davies implies that the erroneous repetition of the word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141776 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the word “mistake” in his allocution. ¶11 During his allocution, Jackson apologized to D.M.B. and stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613734 - 2023-01-24
of the word “mistake” in his allocution. ¶11 During his allocution, Jackson apologized to D.M.B. and stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613734 - 2023-01-24
State v. Thomas H. Bush
of the legislative history of this statute show that likely was the original word used in the draft. The term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13315 - 2005-03-31
of the legislative history of this statute show that likely was the original word used in the draft. The term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13315 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” disposition here. R.G. cites to the court’s following words as support: She’s adoptable. Her foster family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201482 - 2017-11-14
” disposition here. R.G. cites to the court’s following words as support: She’s adoptable. Her foster family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201482 - 2017-11-14

