Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27101 - 27110 of 57351 for id.

State v. David J. Lenz
is unambiguous, we do not look beyond it to determine its meaning. Id. If, however, a statute is ambiguous, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15332 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the possibility of a fair trial. Id. at 306. Courts consider the following factors: (1) the inflammatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98299 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Thomas H. Highman
the delay resulted in any prejudice to the defendant. Id. at ¶6. ¶11 The length of delay is the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3736 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
2022AP1109-CR 10 forma review” of a treatment plan that was not signed by any physician. Id., ¶44
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850383 - 2024-09-18

State v. Robert K.
competency to proceed.” Id., ¶5. Although Wis. Stat. § 48.422(2) requires that fact-finding hearings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7669 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sherman B. Rones
independently. Id. ¶9 Here, Rones specifically contends that his counsel was ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2988 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
stronger than the claims postconviction counsel actually brought.” Id., ¶4. Whether a § 974.06 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238712 - 2019-04-10

[PDF] NOTICE
to whether any factual issues exist. Id. 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56791 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Timothy P. Zoellick
that inference is based is incredible as a matter of law.” Id. at 507. ¶8 WISCONSIN STAT. § 947.01 reads
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4325 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. C&S Management, Inc.
. See id. at 70, 398 N.W.2d at 760. If the statute is targeted at a “suspect class” or affects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8332 - 2017-09-19