Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27101 - 27110 of 40447 for probate forms/1000.
Search results 27101 - 27110 of 40447 for probate forms/1000.
[PDF]
WI APP 137
. FACTS ¶2 On December 28, 2004, Lala received an unscheduled home visit from his probation officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38547 - 2014-09-15
. FACTS ¶2 On December 28, 2004, Lala received an unscheduled home visit from his probation officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38547 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or not the penalty is rebated, suspended, or probated, in this state or any other jurisdiction. ¶17 This statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207787 - 2018-02-01
or not the penalty is rebated, suspended, or probated, in this state or any other jurisdiction. ¶17 This statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207787 - 2018-02-01
State v. David A. Porth, Sr.
and was sentenced to two five-year concurrent prison terms and three years of consecutive probation. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4539 - 2005-03-31
and was sentenced to two five-year concurrent prison terms and three years of consecutive probation. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4539 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
approved, providing that Urquhart would be placed on probation and would avoid conviction and prison
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=443735 - 2021-10-20
approved, providing that Urquhart would be placed on probation and would avoid conviction and prison
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=443735 - 2021-10-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supervision. Henley’s sentence was stayed for four years of probation. No. 2019AP1787-CR 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307034 - 2020-11-24
supervision. Henley’s sentence was stayed for four years of probation. No. 2019AP1787-CR 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307034 - 2020-11-24
[PDF]
WI 21
in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Sostarich was sentenced in federal court to three years probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32236 - 2014-09-15
in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Sostarich was sentenced in federal court to three years probation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32236 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. On the remaining ten counts, the court withheld sentence in favor of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114858 - 2017-09-21
of extended supervision. On the remaining ten counts, the court withheld sentence in favor of probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114858 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
in probation program under s. 973.11 claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30297 - 2014-09-15
in probation program under s. 973.11 claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30297 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 108
of the robber. Dillard’s probation agent saw the sketch and thought it looked like Dillard, so he became
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100162 - 2017-09-21
of the robber. Dillard’s probation agent saw the sketch and thought it looked like Dillard, so he became
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100162 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David A. Porth, Sr.
to two five-year concurrent prison terms and three years of consecutive probation. ¶7 Porth’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4539 - 2017-09-20
to two five-year concurrent prison terms and three years of consecutive probation. ¶7 Porth’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4539 - 2017-09-20