Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27101 - 27110 of 58506 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. James S. Riedel
. § 346.63(1)(a) (1999-2000). 1 Riedel argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5439 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
incident involving Steiner’s three-year-old son, D.S. According to trial testimony, on the day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124305 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael L. Marks
his postconviction motion for a new trial. We find one issue dispositive on appeal: whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6610 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
), and a violation of WIS. STAT. § 100.18. They demanded damages or rescission. The trial court subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80524 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
heard from Sell’s trial counsel, who testified that his discussion with Sell focused on the total time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36676 - 2009-06-09

Post 2874 v. Redevelopment Authority
by the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee. Post 2874 contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21367 - 2006-02-13

[PDF] State v. Gerald D. Schrank
was arrested and charged with OWI and PAC. His theory of defense at the jury trial was that a person named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7001 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Larry N. Scruggs, pro se, appeals from a trial court order denying Scruggs’s motion to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126353 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Chromium Industries, Inc. v. Milwaukee Boiler Manufacturing Company
of four industrial rolls for Chromium. Milwaukee Boiler contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9648 - 2017-09-19

Tony Schroeckenthaler v. Roger Philbrick
of the two small claims actions and a demand for a trial de novo. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6463 - 2005-03-31