Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27111 - 27120 of 33989 for dismissal.
Search results 27111 - 27120 of 33989 for dismissal.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from the October 25, 2013 order on December 20, 2013. By order dated January 28, 2014, we dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145111 - 2017-09-21
from the October 25, 2013 order on December 20, 2013. By order dated January 28, 2014, we dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145111 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “a circuit court has no discretionary authority to dismiss a refusal charge when a defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206044 - 2017-12-27
that “a circuit court has no discretionary authority to dismiss a refusal charge when a defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206044 - 2017-12-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a crime and agreed to dismiss and read in a second count No. 2022AP2219-CR 3 related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718650 - 2023-10-24
to a crime and agreed to dismiss and read in a second count No. 2022AP2219-CR 3 related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718650 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
Kevin M. Jereczek v.
then proceeded with the hearing, at which the parties stipulated to dismissal of the action and submission
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17100 - 2017-09-21
then proceeded with the hearing, at which the parties stipulated to dismissal of the action and submission
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17100 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the jury trial, the State moved to dismiss one of the charges. Viveros was convicted of the five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204764 - 2017-12-12
the jury trial, the State moved to dismiss one of the charges. Viveros was convicted of the five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204764 - 2017-12-12
State v. T.J. International, Inc.
also moved for dismissal on two jurisdictional issues and again raises those issues on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16147 - 2007-09-30
also moved for dismissal on two jurisdictional issues and again raises those issues on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16147 - 2007-09-30
State v. Henry J. Brookshire
that I'd get off better. THE COURT: Because the case was being dismissed against you? THE DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9257 - 2005-03-31
that I'd get off better. THE COURT: Because the case was being dismissed against you? THE DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9257 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
against Mark were dismissed, along with Jerome’s counterclaim. Mark and Jerome stipulated that the only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103304 - 2013-10-21
against Mark were dismissed, along with Jerome’s counterclaim. Mark and Jerome stipulated that the only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103304 - 2013-10-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was denied as procedurally barred. Thomas appealed, but later voluntarily dismissed the appeal. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147020 - 2015-08-24
was denied as procedurally barred. Thomas appealed, but later voluntarily dismissed the appeal. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147020 - 2015-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
the weapons enhancer, and would dismiss the other charges in the complaint and would not prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88641 - 2012-10-24
the weapons enhancer, and would dismiss the other charges in the complaint and would not prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88641 - 2012-10-24