Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27131 - 27140 of 63251 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 27131 - 27140 of 63251 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) & 939.63(1)(b) (2013-14). 1 He also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185298 - 2017-09-21
) & 939.63(1)(b) (2013-14). 1 He also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185298 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Alex Nieves
from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Nieves claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4690 - 2017-09-19
from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Nieves claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4690 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Stillwell withdrew his competing motion to modify support, and (3) Stillwell failed to provide complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110488 - 2014-04-21
Stillwell withdrew his competing motion to modify support, and (3) Stillwell failed to provide complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110488 - 2014-04-21
State v. Daniel J. Marinko, Sr.
a judgment of conviction for homicide and burglary and an order denying his postconviction motions. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4904 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of conviction for homicide and burglary and an order denying his postconviction motions. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4904 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alex Nieves
postconviction motion for sentence modification. Nieves claims that: (1) there was insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4690 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion for sentence modification. Nieves claims that: (1) there was insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4690 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and from the order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. He argues that the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57780 - 2010-12-14
and from the order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. He argues that the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57780 - 2010-12-14
Frontsheet
, 2010, Attorney Gorokhovsky filed a motion for stay, claiming to the Illinois court that on August 11
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105746 - 2013-12-16
, 2010, Attorney Gorokhovsky filed a motion for stay, claiming to the Illinois court that on August 11
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105746 - 2013-12-16
Jack Gasparac v. Mae Schunk
of their mother while their mother was alive. During proceedings on that motion, the court appointed a special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4869 - 2005-03-31
of their mother while their mother was alive. During proceedings on that motion, the court appointed a special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4869 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Marinko, Sr.
of conviction for homicide and burglary and an order denying his postconviction motions. He argues that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4904 - 2017-09-19
of conviction for homicide and burglary and an order denying his postconviction motions. He argues that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4904 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. As a result, the court denied the State’s motion to admit the footage, and granted Johnson’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1044665 - 2025-12-02
. As a result, the court denied the State’s motion to admit the footage, and granted Johnson’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1044665 - 2025-12-02