Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27131 - 27140 of 30072 for de.
Search results 27131 - 27140 of 30072 for de.
State v. David C. Liebnitz
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17417 - 2011-01-31
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17417 - 2011-01-31
Frontsheet
is a question of law that we review de novo, applying the same standards used by the circuit and set forth
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64259 - 2011-05-16
is a question of law that we review de novo, applying the same standards used by the circuit and set forth
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64259 - 2011-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. (citations omitted). If the motion does not allege sufficient facts, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32111 - 2008-03-17
review de novo. Id. (citations omitted). If the motion does not allege sufficient facts, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32111 - 2008-03-17
State v. Edward L. Riley
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. 1. Was Riley’s detention valid under the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13903 - 2009-06-22
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. 1. Was Riley’s detention valid under the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13903 - 2009-06-22
State v. Ronald J. Zanelli
conduct violated the terms of a plea agreement is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v. Poole, 131
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11172 - 2005-03-31
conduct violated the terms of a plea agreement is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v. Poole, 131
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11172 - 2005-03-31
HSBC Realty Credit Corporation v. City of Glendale
review de novo. State v. Waushara County Bd. of Adjustment, 2004 WI 56, ¶14, 271 Wis. 2d 547, 679 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25766 - 2006-08-29
review de novo. State v. Waushara County Bd. of Adjustment, 2004 WI 56, ¶14, 271 Wis. 2d 547, 679 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25766 - 2006-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment our review is de novo, and we apply the same methodology as the circuit court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33175 - 2008-06-25
of summary judgment our review is de novo, and we apply the same methodology as the circuit court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33175 - 2008-06-25
[PDF]
WI APP 22
63, ¶13, 317 Wis. 2d 734, 767 N.W.2d 343. ¶16 Our review of the Board’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630355 - 2023-05-23
63, ¶13, 317 Wis. 2d 734, 767 N.W.2d 343. ¶16 Our review of the Board’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630355 - 2023-05-23
[PDF]
WI 112
the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29853 - 2014-09-15
the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29853 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert A. Benkoski v. Mark A. Flood
interpretation that we review de novo. ¶25 Flood argues that the trial court erred in doubling Benkoski’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2585 - 2017-09-19
interpretation that we review de novo. ¶25 Flood argues that the trial court erred in doubling Benkoski’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2585 - 2017-09-19