Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27131 - 27140 of 29823 for des.
Search results 27131 - 27140 of 29823 for des.
State v. Matthew Polster
prejudiced the defense are questions of law, which we decide de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21512 - 2006-02-22
prejudiced the defense are questions of law, which we decide de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21512 - 2006-02-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law reviewed de novo. Id. at 128. A. Attorney Boyle 1. Denial of right to counsel. ¶22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50893 - 2014-09-15
of law reviewed de novo. Id. at 128. A. Attorney Boyle 1. Denial of right to counsel. ¶22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50893 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2022AP877 5 Statutory interpretation is a legal issue that this court resolves de novo. Coston v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635501 - 2023-03-22
). No. 2022AP877 5 Statutory interpretation is a legal issue that this court resolves de novo. Coston v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635501 - 2023-03-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
a question of law. Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21. This court reviews de novo the legal questions of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30575 - 2014-09-15
a question of law. Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21. This court reviews de novo the legal questions of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30575 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether trial counsel’s performance satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159646 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether trial counsel’s performance satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159646 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
John L. Gorton v. Hostak
and contract interpretation. We review such questions de novo. See McEvoy v. Group Health Co-op of Eau
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17159 - 2017-09-21
and contract interpretation. We review such questions de novo. See McEvoy v. Group Health Co-op of Eau
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17159 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
John T. Morris v. Juneau County
interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. See Colby v. Columbia County 202 Wis. 2d 342, 349
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17149 - 2017-09-21
interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. See Colby v. Columbia County 202 Wis. 2d 342, 349
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17149 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 41
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81740 - 2014-09-15
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81740 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment ruling is de novo. L.L.N., 209 Wis. 2d at 682. I am not concluding that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603788 - 2022-12-22
summary judgment ruling is de novo. L.L.N., 209 Wis. 2d at 682. I am not concluding that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603788 - 2022-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which this court reviews de novo, while accepting any findings of fact made by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599089 - 2022-12-08
of law, which this court reviews de novo, while accepting any findings of fact made by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599089 - 2022-12-08