Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27131 - 27140 of 58312 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. ¶1 BLANCHARD, J.1 Raymond Barton was found guilty at a jury trial of battery, disorderly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291067 - 2020-09-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court’s order reversing LIRC’s determination that Holland Galante was an employee of Varsity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248576 - 2019-10-15

Kathleen Krejci v. John Krejci
,” a lakeside resort consisting of six rental cabins and a residence. John argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5994 - 2008-07-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Jagiello (“the Jagiellos”) appeal a judgment, entered following a bench trial, determining that David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237743 - 2019-03-19

[PDF] State v. Roger P. VanderLogt
of a § 974.06, STATS., motion or a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the trial court. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11111 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 163
resulted in an increased property tax. Shister appeals the trial court’s summary judgment order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42744 - 2014-09-15

WI App 105 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2298-CR Complete Titl...
questioning thereafter. We therefore conclude that the trial court erred as a matter of law in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86047 - 2012-09-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and improper factors when imposing his sentence. Shaughnessy further asserts that his trial attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=703564 - 2023-09-19

[PDF] WI App 105
also did not reinitiate questioning thereafter. We therefore conclude that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86047 - 2014-09-15

Precision Erecting, Inc. v. M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank
to the suit as a matter of issue preclusion. That is what the trial court held and we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13150 - 2005-03-31