Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27141 - 27150 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 27141 - 27150 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Campbell’s appointed appellate counsel has filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185371 - 2017-09-21
denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Campbell’s appointed appellate counsel has filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185371 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. He argues that the sentence was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57780 - 2014-09-15
the order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. He argues that the sentence was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57780 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
exercised its discretion when it granted the State’s motion to amend the amended information at the close
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67302 - 2011-07-11
exercised its discretion when it granted the State’s motion to amend the amended information at the close
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67302 - 2011-07-11
[PDF]
American Family Life Insurance Company v. Michael S. Busjahn
Michael's cross-motion for summary judgment and dismissed his claim with prejudice. Michael disputes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2252 - 2017-09-19
Michael's cross-motion for summary judgment and dismissed his claim with prejudice. Michael disputes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2252 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue on appeal is whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240533 - 2019-05-14
the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue on appeal is whether the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240533 - 2019-05-14
Milwaukee Women's Medical Service, Inc. v. Joseph Scheidler
from a trial court order granting the motion of Milwaukee Women’s Medical Services, Inc., National
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13915 - 2005-03-31
from a trial court order granting the motion of Milwaukee Women’s Medical Services, Inc., National
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13915 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Austin argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because it based its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86046 - 2014-09-15
. Austin argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because it based its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86046 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and ordered abatement of the nuisance. Basswood and Sargent filed a motion to vacate the default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209464 - 2018-03-08
, and ordered abatement of the nuisance. Basswood and Sargent filed a motion to vacate the default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209464 - 2018-03-08
2007 WI APP 227
the judgment of conviction and the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30367 - 2007-10-30
the judgment of conviction and the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30367 - 2007-10-30
COURT OF APPEALS
erred in denying his motion to suppress because it based its decision on insufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86046 - 2012-08-13
erred in denying his motion to suppress because it based its decision on insufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86046 - 2012-08-13