Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27141 - 27150 of 29821 for des.
Search results 27141 - 27150 of 29821 for des.
[PDF]
Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
of law, which we review de novo. E.g., Stockbridge School Dist. v. Department of Pub. Instruction Sch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16908 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. E.g., Stockbridge School Dist. v. Department of Pub. Instruction Sch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16908 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., ¶14 (citation omitted). ¶14 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180502 - 2017-09-21
sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id., ¶14 (citation omitted). ¶14 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180502 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 131
and the interpretation of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Hillhaven Corp. v. DHFS, 232 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27514 - 2014-09-15
and the interpretation of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Hillhaven Corp. v. DHFS, 232 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27514 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI App 43
and the interpretation of a municipal ordinance is a question of law subject to de novo review. Board of Regents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31863 - 2008-03-18
and the interpretation of a municipal ordinance is a question of law subject to de novo review. Board of Regents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31863 - 2008-03-18
John T. Morris v. Juneau County
review de novo. See Colby v. Columbia County 202 Wis. 2d 342, 349, 550 N.W.2d 124 (1996) (citing Pufahl
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17149 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See Colby v. Columbia County 202 Wis. 2d 342, 349, 550 N.W.2d 124 (1996) (citing Pufahl
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17149 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81883 - 2005-03-31
of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81883 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142363 - 2015-05-19
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142363 - 2015-05-19
State v. Ronald J. Zanelli
conduct violated the terms of a plea agreement is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v. Poole, 131
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11172 - 2005-03-31
conduct violated the terms of a plea agreement is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v. Poole, 131
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11172 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5, 305 Wis. 2d 71, 740
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113971 - 2009-03-23
on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5, 305 Wis. 2d 71, 740
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113971 - 2009-03-23
WI App 74 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2009AP746-W, 2010AP1064 C...
is procedurally barred is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83484 - 2012-07-26
is procedurally barred is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83484 - 2012-07-26