Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27141 - 27150 of 58436 for speedy trial.
Search results 27141 - 27150 of 58436 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Guy N. Giese
is a matter within the trial court’s discretion. See State v. C.V.C., 153 Wis.2d 145, 161, 450 N.W.2d 463
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10925 - 2017-09-20
is a matter within the trial court’s discretion. See State v. C.V.C., 153 Wis.2d 145, 161, 450 N.W.2d 463
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10925 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Outagamie County v. Karen C.
a protective placement order. She argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4556 - 2017-09-20
a protective placement order. She argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4556 - 2017-09-20
Sara A. Tridle v. Grace G. Horn
and an order of the trial court. The court entered judgment against Horn in favor of Midwest Security
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4703 - 2005-03-31
and an order of the trial court. The court entered judgment against Horn in favor of Midwest Security
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4703 - 2005-03-31
Post 2874 v. Redevelopment Authority
by the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee. Post 2874 contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21367 - 2006-02-13
by the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee. Post 2874 contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21367 - 2006-02-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Larry N. Scruggs, pro se, appeals from a trial court order denying Scruggs’s motion to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126353 - 2017-09-21
. Larry N. Scruggs, pro se, appeals from a trial court order denying Scruggs’s motion to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126353 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
heard from Sell’s trial counsel, who testified that his discussion with Sell focused on the total time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36676 - 2009-06-09
heard from Sell’s trial counsel, who testified that his discussion with Sell focused on the total time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36676 - 2009-06-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance. Specifically, Johnson claims that his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211810 - 2018-04-25
that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance. Specifically, Johnson claims that his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211810 - 2018-04-25
[PDF]
State v. Roger P. VanderLogt
of a § 974.06, STATS., motion or a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the trial court. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11111 - 2017-09-19
of a § 974.06, STATS., motion or a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the trial court. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11111 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that he should be permitted to withdraw his no-contest plea for two reasons: (1) his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800711 - 2024-05-14
contends that he should be permitted to withdraw his no-contest plea for two reasons: (1) his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800711 - 2024-05-14
99-CV-250 Grice Engineering, Inc. v. Kathleen M. Szyjewski
-trial motion that the jury foreperson inadvertently wrote “$2400.00” as the answer to a verdict question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3481 - 2005-03-31
-trial motion that the jury foreperson inadvertently wrote “$2400.00” as the answer to a verdict question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3481 - 2005-03-31