Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27151 - 27160 of 63485 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 27151 - 27160 of 63485 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Jason Sypher appeals a judgment of conviction, an order denying his postconviction motion, and two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013584 - 2025-09-25
. Jason Sypher appeals a judgment of conviction, an order denying his postconviction motion, and two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013584 - 2025-09-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
motions. The issues are whether Wingo is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33698 - 2014-09-15
motions. The issues are whether Wingo is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33698 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 motion to dismiss. He contends that the officer failed to use audible and visual signals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30881 - 2014-09-15
2 motion to dismiss. He contends that the officer failed to use audible and visual signals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30881 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
: MICHAEL G. MALMSTADT and michael b. brennan, Judges.[1] Affirmed, motion granted, and cause remanded. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29562 - 2007-07-02
: MICHAEL G. MALMSTADT and michael b. brennan, Judges.[1] Affirmed, motion granted, and cause remanded. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29562 - 2007-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motions. The issues are whether Wingo is entitled to: (1) postconviction deoxyribonucleic acid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33698 - 2008-08-11
postconviction motions. The issues are whether Wingo is entitled to: (1) postconviction deoxyribonucleic acid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33698 - 2008-08-11
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Cheryl E.
, 2004. ¶4 On February 16, 2004, a hearing was held addressing the parties’ motions in limine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7671 - 2017-09-19
, 2004. ¶4 On February 16, 2004, a hearing was held addressing the parties’ motions in limine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7671 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the order denying his postconviction motion.2 Holliman’s appellate counsel, Assistant State Public
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252794 - 2020-01-22
the order denying his postconviction motion.2 Holliman’s appellate counsel, Assistant State Public
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252794 - 2020-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Lisimba Liteef Love appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64048 - 2011-05-16
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Lisimba Liteef Love appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64048 - 2011-05-16
[PDF]
Elaine Wysocki v. Town of Kronenwetter
, the Town filed motions seeking dismissal of the claims because the Wysockis had never filed notices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3794 - 2017-09-20
, the Town filed motions seeking dismissal of the claims because the Wysockis had never filed notices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3794 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Michael Wysocki v. Town of Kronenwetter
, the Town filed motions seeking dismissal of the claims because the Wysockis had never filed notices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3795 - 2017-09-20
, the Town filed motions seeking dismissal of the claims because the Wysockis had never filed notices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3795 - 2017-09-20