Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27151 - 27160 of 83284 for case search.
Search results 27151 - 27160 of 83284 for case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the argument in his appellate briefing. No. 2024AP2385 2 that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043048 - 2025-11-26
the argument in his appellate briefing. No. 2024AP2385 2 that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043048 - 2025-11-26
State v. Mitchel P.
said, he said” case. Picking up on that theme, we portray Mitchel’s argument in the following manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19537 - 2005-09-06
said, he said” case. Picking up on that theme, we portray Mitchel’s argument in the following manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19537 - 2005-09-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment is made and supported by a prima facie case for summary judgment, an adverse party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174251 - 2017-09-21
for summary judgment is made and supported by a prima facie case for summary judgment, an adverse party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174251 - 2017-09-21
State v. Guillermo Gutierrez
that the prosecution in this case violated his double jeopardy protection. Like the trial court, we reject Gutierrez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5982 - 2005-03-31
that the prosecution in this case violated his double jeopardy protection. Like the trial court, we reject Gutierrez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5982 - 2005-03-31
State v. Susan M. Curtis
probable cause for arrest.” Id. at 316. ¶9 The question in this case is whether the facts observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2939 - 2005-03-31
probable cause for arrest.” Id. at 316. ¶9 The question in this case is whether the facts observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2939 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
elicited evidence regarding a threat in its case-in-chief. ¶2 The trial court held that her argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252447 - 2020-01-22
elicited evidence regarding a threat in its case-in-chief. ¶2 The trial court held that her argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252447 - 2020-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to disappointment in his sentence; (4) the issue is of statewide importance because there are no published cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682853 - 2023-07-25
to disappointment in his sentence; (4) the issue is of statewide importance because there are no published cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682853 - 2023-07-25
[PDF]
State Public Defender v. Circuit Court for Fond Du Lac County
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8249 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8249 - 2017-09-19
Alan D. Eisenberg v. William E. Deutsch, Jr.
in this case were well grounded in fact. See Wis. Stat. § 802.05. To be “well grounded in fact,” a pleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20738 - 2005-12-21
in this case were well grounded in fact. See Wis. Stat. § 802.05. To be “well grounded in fact,” a pleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20738 - 2005-12-21
Richard G. Bedessem v. Donna J. Bedessem
. Accordingly, we remanded the case to permit the circuit court to reconsider any other determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14034 - 2005-03-31
. Accordingly, we remanded the case to permit the circuit court to reconsider any other determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14034 - 2005-03-31