Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27151 - 27160 of 50556 for our.
Search results 27151 - 27160 of 50556 for our.
William N. Ledford v. William Noland
” never becomes the final ICRS decision. The department appears to share our interpretation in its letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15683 - 2005-03-31
” never becomes the final ICRS decision. The department appears to share our interpretation in its letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15683 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Ware
in sentencing, our review is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11274 - 2005-03-31
in sentencing, our review is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11274 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion or notice of appeal. Although not addressed in the no-merit report, our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599420 - 2022-12-14
motion or notice of appeal. Although not addressed in the no-merit report, our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599420 - 2022-12-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
alleged that the State breached the plea agreement at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159291 - 2017-09-21
alleged that the State breached the plea agreement at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159291 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 86, 90, 423 N.W.2d 533 (1988). There, our supreme court held that “no dual credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111030 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 86, 90, 423 N.W.2d 533 (1988). There, our supreme court held that “no dual credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111030 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
As discussed in our order dated April 16, 2007, Sturdevant’s appeal was timely from the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32474 - 2008-04-16
As discussed in our order dated April 16, 2007, Sturdevant’s appeal was timely from the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32474 - 2008-04-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arguable merit. Our independent review of the record does not disclose any potentially meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198171 - 2017-10-25
arguable merit. Our independent review of the record does not disclose any potentially meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198171 - 2017-10-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, there would be no arguable merit to an appellate challenge to the sentence. Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=438572 - 2021-10-12
, there would be no arguable merit to an appellate challenge to the sentence. Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=438572 - 2021-10-12
CA Blank Order
). Our independent review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147090 - 2015-08-20
). Our independent review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147090 - 2015-08-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that renders him “in custody.” Grant is mistaken about Theoharopoulos. In that case our supreme court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069223 - 2026-01-29
that renders him “in custody.” Grant is mistaken about Theoharopoulos. In that case our supreme court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069223 - 2026-01-29