Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27151 - 27160 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 27151 - 27160 of 58506 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
se, appeals from a trial court order denying Scruggs’s motion to reopen a default judgment pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126353 - 2014-11-11
se, appeals from a trial court order denying Scruggs’s motion to reopen a default judgment pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126353 - 2014-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
stopped.[2] ¶3 The trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing. Wisconsin Department of Justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109118 - 2014-03-17
stopped.[2] ¶3 The trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing. Wisconsin Department of Justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109118 - 2014-03-17
[PDF]
State v. James S. Riedel
. § 346.63(1)(a) (1999-2000). 1 Riedel argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5439 - 2017-09-19
. § 346.63(1)(a) (1999-2000). 1 Riedel argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5439 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
incident involving Steiner’s three-year-old son, D.S. According to trial testimony, on the day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124305 - 2017-09-21
incident involving Steiner’s three-year-old son, D.S. According to trial testimony, on the day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124305 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Marks
his postconviction motion for a new trial. We find one issue dispositive on appeal: whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6610 - 2017-09-19
his postconviction motion for a new trial. We find one issue dispositive on appeal: whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6610 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), and a violation of WIS. STAT. § 100.18. They demanded damages or rescission. The trial court subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80524 - 2014-09-15
), and a violation of WIS. STAT. § 100.18. They demanded damages or rescission. The trial court subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80524 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
heard from Sell’s trial counsel, who testified that his discussion with Sell focused on the total time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36676 - 2009-06-09
heard from Sell’s trial counsel, who testified that his discussion with Sell focused on the total time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36676 - 2009-06-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. State v. Roberts, 196 Wis. 2d 445
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31601 - 2014-09-15
the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. State v. Roberts, 196 Wis. 2d 445
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31601 - 2014-09-15
Post 2874 v. Redevelopment Authority
by the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee. Post 2874 contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21367 - 2006-02-13
by the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee. Post 2874 contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21367 - 2006-02-13
[PDF]
State v. Gerald D. Schrank
was arrested and charged with OWI and PAC. His theory of defense at the jury trial was that a person named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7001 - 2017-09-20
was arrested and charged with OWI and PAC. His theory of defense at the jury trial was that a person named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7001 - 2017-09-20