Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27161 - 27170 of 29959 for de.
Search results 27161 - 27170 of 29959 for de.
[PDF]
WI APP 126
. 1998). We apply these standards de novo to the Common Council’s decision, reviewing that decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68147 - 2014-09-15
. 1998). We apply these standards de novo to the Common Council’s decision, reviewing that decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68147 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231224 - 2018-12-28
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231224 - 2018-12-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for judgment notwithstanding the verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the [circuit] court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169839 - 2017-09-21
for judgment notwithstanding the verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the [circuit] court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169839 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to those facts de novo. Id. ¶19 The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317204 - 2020-12-22
to those facts de novo. Id. ¶19 The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317204 - 2020-12-22
[PDF]
John P. Trachte v. Andrew E. Barrer
the merits of the trial court's decision de novo, First Nat'l Bank v. Dickinson, 103 Wis.2d 428, 442, 308
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8301 - 2017-09-19
the merits of the trial court's decision de novo, First Nat'l Bank v. Dickinson, 103 Wis.2d 428, 442, 308
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8301 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional due process subject to de novo review. See State v. Prineas, 2012 WI App 2, ¶15, 338 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290186 - 2020-09-22
of constitutional due process subject to de novo review. See State v. Prineas, 2012 WI App 2, ¶15, 338 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290186 - 2020-09-22
Frontsheet
stipulated to the facts, this appeal only raises a question of law, which we review de novo."). [7] Id. [8
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138970 - 2015-03-31
stipulated to the facts, this appeal only raises a question of law, which we review de novo."). [7] Id. [8
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138970 - 2015-03-31
Rhonda Miller v. Craig J. Thomack
judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9275 - 2005-03-31
judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9275 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law that we review de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34634 - 2008-11-17
and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law that we review de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34634 - 2008-11-17
[PDF]
WI APP 57
. The Court reasoned it “ma[de] sense for Congress to have classified as a ‘misdemeanor crime of domestic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143097 - 2017-09-21
. The Court reasoned it “ma[de] sense for Congress to have classified as a ‘misdemeanor crime of domestic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143097 - 2017-09-21