Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27181 - 27190 of 29958 for de.
Search results 27181 - 27190 of 29958 for de.
Angela M. McEvoy v. Group Health Cooperative of Eau Claire
a question of law that we determine de novo. See First Nat. Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis. 2d 205
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17104 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we determine de novo. See First Nat. Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis. 2d 205
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17104 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Douglas Scott Geen v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
conclusion of law, there are three possible levels of deference: great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4475 - 2017-09-19
conclusion of law, there are three possible levels of deference: great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4475 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John T. Shaw
is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis.2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506, 509
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14025 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis.2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506, 509
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14025 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 152
judgment is well-known. We review the denial or grant of a summary judgment motion de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55831 - 2010-11-16
judgment is well-known. We review the denial or grant of a summary judgment motion de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55831 - 2010-11-16
Isaacs Holding Corp. v. Premiere Property Group, LLC
de novo. See State v. Hansford, 219 Wis. 2d 226, 246, 580 N.W.2d 171 (1998). ¶32 Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6775 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Hansford, 219 Wis. 2d 226, 246, 580 N.W.2d 171 (1998). ¶32 Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6775 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. ¶20 Of importance to our analysis of Nelson’s claims is that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329192 - 2021-01-28
review de novo. Id. ¶20 Of importance to our analysis of Nelson’s claims is that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329192 - 2021-01-28
[PDF]
State v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment
conducting statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court's ruling is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10761 - 2017-09-20
conducting statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court's ruling is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10761 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
., 55 Wis. 2d 27, 33, 197 N.W.2d 783 (1972) (citations omitted). ¶14 We review de novo the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60123 - 2011-02-16
., 55 Wis. 2d 27, 33, 197 N.W.2d 783 (1972) (citations omitted). ¶14 We review de novo the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60123 - 2011-02-16
[PDF]
Wisconsin Citizens Concerned for Cranes and Doves v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
.2d 659. ¶5 Our review is de novo, but in deciding this question of law, we may derive “benefit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5214 - 2017-09-19
.2d 659. ¶5 Our review is de novo, but in deciding this question of law, we may derive “benefit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5214 - 2017-09-19
State v. John T. Shaw
.) The interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis.2d 397, 405-06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14025 - 2005-03-31
.) The interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis.2d 397, 405-06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14025 - 2005-03-31