Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27181 - 27190 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 27181 - 27190 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Louis M. Anderson
which would support such a view of the evidence. His argument is merely a general statement that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10105 - 2005-03-31
which would support such a view of the evidence. His argument is merely a general statement that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10105 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his postconviction motion. Indeed, he represents in his statement on transcript that a transcript
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102925 - 2017-09-21
his postconviction motion. Indeed, he represents in his statement on transcript that a transcript
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102925 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Raymond Tomczyk v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
at 84. This was the statement relied upon by the trial court and respondents. After the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14032 - 2014-09-15
at 84. This was the statement relied upon by the trial court and respondents. After the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14032 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. That reading included a statement informing Evans that he was charged with attempting to cause the death
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234877 - 2019-02-14
. That reading included a statement informing Evans that he was charged with attempting to cause the death
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234877 - 2019-02-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
basis for Teloh’s pleas—was “inaccurate.” The court addressed Teloh’s statement at the beginning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699527 - 2023-09-06
basis for Teloh’s pleas—was “inaccurate.” The court addressed Teloh’s statement at the beginning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699527 - 2023-09-06
State v. Peter T. Nelson
of probation. Nelson did not object or exercise his right of allocution in response to counsel's statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8771 - 2009-08-17
of probation. Nelson did not object or exercise his right of allocution in response to counsel's statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8771 - 2009-08-17
State v. Estella Marie Iddings
’ prearrest statement to police was properly denied and whether it was proper to exclude evidence of Renee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11451 - 2011-02-28
’ prearrest statement to police was properly denied and whether it was proper to exclude evidence of Renee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11451 - 2011-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a substantial change in circumstances. His motion relied on conclusory statements rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914079 - 2025-02-19
a substantial change in circumstances. His motion relied on conclusory statements rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914079 - 2025-02-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
statement in that regard or argue that he should also be resentenced on Count 5. No. 2024AP1357
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921949 - 2025-03-04
statement in that regard or argue that he should also be resentenced on Count 5. No. 2024AP1357
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921949 - 2025-03-04
State v. Todd D. Dagnall
violates the defendant’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination with statements “manifestly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5505 - 2005-03-31
violates the defendant’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination with statements “manifestly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5505 - 2005-03-31