Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27181 - 27190 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.

State v. John A. Lulloff
Wis. 2d 128, 139, 456 N.W.2d 830 (1990). This requires application of a commonsense test: under all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7194 - 2005-03-31

State v. Craig Shelton Hayes
with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion." The test is objective: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13234 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
to constitutional principles. Id. What constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33774 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Tarek Genena
State v. Dunn, 121 Wis.2d 389, 397- 98, 359 N.W.2d 151, 155 (1984). That test is satisfied when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11049 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Village of Oregon v. Robyn R. Sunday
on documentary evidence, such as the officer’s police report, the blood alcohol test report, etc. Similarly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4305 - 2017-09-19

William Putze v. Thomas A. Ernstmeyer, Jr.
that the trial court erred because the test is not whether he met his burden of proof or persuasion, but whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8830 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
)). The determination of reasonableness is a commonsense test. Id., ¶13. The crucial question is whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50820 - 2010-06-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
judge could reach.” Id., ¶30. Here, the circuit court expressly cited the legal test set forth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102846 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Rodney Dombrowski
194, 564 N.W.2d 716 (1997), this case is governed by the test set out in Pickens v. State, 96 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5774 - 2017-09-19

State v. Dawn L. Sanders
after selling a white substance that tested positive for cocaine to a confidential informant of the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17