Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2721 - 2730 of 24584 for extending.
Search results 2721 - 2730 of 24584 for extending.
[PDF]
State v. James Gruentzel
, followed by twenty years of extended supervision. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6934 - 2017-09-20
, followed by twenty years of extended supervision. He has also appealed from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6934 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
and two years of extended supervision. For the witness intimidation count, the trial court imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140327 - 2015-04-19
and two years of extended supervision. For the witness intimidation count, the trial court imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140327 - 2015-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of the extended supervision portion of the sentence up to the trial court. The presentence report recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29468 - 2007-06-25
of the extended supervision portion of the sentence up to the trial court. The presentence report recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29468 - 2007-06-25
[PDF]
WI App 83
and five years of extended supervision. Carroll’s sentence was ordered consecutive to a revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83719 - 2014-09-15
and five years of extended supervision. Carroll’s sentence was ordered consecutive to a revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83719 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to extend the statutorily authorized detention period prior to a probable cause hearing beyond seventy-two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121149 - 2014-09-15
to extend the statutorily authorized detention period prior to a probable cause hearing beyond seventy-two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121149 - 2014-09-15
WI App 83 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1922-CR Complete Tit...
confinement and five years of extended supervision. Carroll’s sentence was ordered consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83719 - 2012-07-26
confinement and five years of extended supervision. Carroll’s sentence was ordered consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83719 - 2012-07-26
CA Blank Order
the suppression motion, we reject the no-merit report, dismiss the instant appeal without prejudice, and extend
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106928 - 2014-01-14
the suppression motion, we reject the no-merit report, dismiss the instant appeal without prejudice, and extend
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106928 - 2014-01-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in general, but also because Rogers was already on extended supervision for another drug charge when he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210462 - 2018-03-28
in general, but also because Rogers was already on extended supervision for another drug charge when he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210462 - 2018-03-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision. The trial court conducted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219680 - 2018-09-20
years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision. The trial court conducted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219680 - 2018-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as to extended supervision. For his part, Eggars agreed to provide testimony against the other individuals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162228 - 2017-09-21
as to extended supervision. For his part, Eggars agreed to provide testimony against the other individuals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162228 - 2017-09-21