Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2721 - 2730 of 73363 for ha.
Search results 2721 - 2730 of 73363 for ha.
State v. Anthony Murray
. It is [§] 973.0135[, Stats.,] and applies where the individual who has committed a serious felony within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9682 - 2005-03-31
. It is [§] 973.0135[, Stats.,] and applies where the individual who has committed a serious felony within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9682 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
agree with the circuit court’s conclusion that Rowell has not shown he is entitled to the writ. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123553 - 2017-09-21
agree with the circuit court’s conclusion that Rowell has not shown he is entitled to the writ. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123553 - 2017-09-21
State v. Patricia Marie F-K.
. The petition specifically alleged: 1. Patricia K. has a history of protective services referrals dating back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15037 - 2005-03-31
. The petition specifically alleged: 1. Patricia K. has a history of protective services referrals dating back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15037 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by a preponderance of the evidence that a party has engaged in a pattern or serious incident of interspousal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375668 - 2021-06-15
by a preponderance of the evidence that a party has engaged in a pattern or serious incident of interspousal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375668 - 2021-06-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the following, by clear and convincing evidence: (1) the individual has a primary need for residential care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92610 - 2013-02-06
the following, by clear and convincing evidence: (1) the individual has a primary need for residential care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92610 - 2013-02-06
[PDF]
State v. Harris D. Byers
has first requested the filing of a petition and the Department of Justice (DOJ) has declined. We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17549 - 2017-09-21
has first requested the filing of a petition and the Department of Justice (DOJ) has declined. We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17549 - 2017-09-21
Randall A. Ehle v. Deborah L. Ehle
for an order modifying the divorce judgment “because there has been a change in circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15145 - 2005-03-31
for an order modifying the divorce judgment “because there has been a change in circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15145 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harris D. Byers
that a district attorney lacks authority to file a Chapter 980 petition unless the agency with jurisdiction has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17549 - 2005-03-31
that a district attorney lacks authority to file a Chapter 980 petition unless the agency with jurisdiction has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17549 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Randall A. Ehle v. Deborah L. Ehle
expenses and interest as required by the court’s orders.” Deborah has not disputed that statement. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15145 - 2017-09-21
expenses and interest as required by the court’s orders.” Deborah has not disputed that statement. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15145 - 2017-09-21
State v. Harris D. Byers
that a district attorney lacks authority to file a Chapter 980 petition unless the agency with jurisdiction has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16356 - 2005-03-31
that a district attorney lacks authority to file a Chapter 980 petition unless the agency with jurisdiction has
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16356 - 2005-03-31