Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2721 - 2730 of 20944 for word.
Search results 2721 - 2730 of 20944 for word.
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
The word "shall," when used in a statute, is presumed to be mandatory unless another construction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17017 - 2005-03-31
The word "shall," when used in a statute, is presumed to be mandatory unless another construction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17017 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thao Lor
in the instruction, Lor argues that “[t]he erroneous inclusion of the word ‘or’ meant that the jury could find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13519 - 2005-03-31
in the instruction, Lor argues that “[t]he erroneous inclusion of the word ‘or’ meant that the jury could find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13519 - 2005-03-31
WI App 23 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP62 Complete Title of C...
of that nature.” What matters is residential use, not the duration of the use. The words “single-family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134011 - 2015-03-24
of that nature.” What matters is residential use, not the duration of the use. The words “single-family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134011 - 2015-03-24
Toumkham Rabideau v. Milan W. Stiller
the omission is called to the attention of the pleader or the movant.” (Emphasis added.) In other words, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25694 - 2006-07-25
the omission is called to the attention of the pleader or the movant.” (Emphasis added.) In other words, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25694 - 2006-07-25
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin
, on harmless error grounds. In other words, the reasoning of the Court of Appeals in this case permits
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/negrete.pdf - 2012-01-31
, on harmless error grounds. In other words, the reasoning of the Court of Appeals in this case permits
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/negrete.pdf - 2012-01-31
[PDF]
WI 52
N.W.2d 659). We assume that the meaning of a statute is expressed in the words the legislature
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32916 - 2014-09-15
N.W.2d 659). We assume that the meaning of a statute is expressed in the words the legislature
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32916 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
. Voters do not have the same access to the “words” of a provision as the legislators who framed those
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118664 - 2014-07-30
. Voters do not have the same access to the “words” of a provision as the legislators who framed those
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118664 - 2014-07-30
[PDF]
WI 11
, 976 N.W.2d 356. The word “offense” is a familiar term that is generally defined as “an infraction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940275 - 2025-04-10
, 976 N.W.2d 356. The word “offense” is a familiar term that is generally defined as “an infraction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940275 - 2025-04-10
Althea M. Keup v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services
and unambiguous, we may not look beyond the plain words of the statute in question to ascertain its meaning. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16594 - 2014-09-23
and unambiguous, we may not look beyond the plain words of the statute in question to ascertain its meaning. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16594 - 2014-09-23
[PDF]
State v. David S. Stenklyft
apply the plain meaning of the words of a statute in light of its textually manifest scope, context
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18504 - 2017-09-21
apply the plain meaning of the words of a statute in light of its textually manifest scope, context
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18504 - 2017-09-21