Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27211 - 27220 of 63276 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 27211 - 27220 of 63276 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Barry M. Jenkins
No. 2005AP302-CR 2 to WIS. STAT. § 961.41(1)(d)1. (2001-02),1 and from orders denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21578 - 2017-09-21
No. 2005AP302-CR 2 to WIS. STAT. § 961.41(1)(d)1. (2001-02),1 and from orders denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21578 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
”). The order denied New Life’s motion for summary judgment, partially granted the Respondents’ motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145483 - 2015-07-30
”). The order denied New Life’s motion for summary judgment, partially granted the Respondents’ motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145483 - 2015-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and then Stackhouse lunged at James in a stabbing motion and pointed at him in a gun-like fashion before James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253798 - 2020-02-11
, and then Stackhouse lunged at James in a stabbing motion and pointed at him in a gun-like fashion before James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253798 - 2020-02-11
[PDF]
WI APP 187
improvement project.4 Lamar filed a motion to dismiss its case before DHA, contending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34665 - 2014-09-15
improvement project.4 Lamar filed a motion to dismiss its case before DHA, contending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34665 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
) whether the trial court properly concluded that Muller could not assert her own claim because her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3514 - 2017-09-19
) whether the trial court properly concluded that Muller could not assert her own claim because her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3514 - 2017-09-19
State v. Barry M. Jenkins
offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1)(d)1. (2001-02),[1] and from orders denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21578 - 2006-02-23
offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1)(d)1. (2001-02),[1] and from orders denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21578 - 2006-02-23
[PDF]
WI App 65
court order granting the City’s motion for summary judgment and permitting the City to raze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723416 - 2024-01-18
court order granting the City’s motion for summary judgment and permitting the City to raze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723416 - 2024-01-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. ¶2 Smith first asserts that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60643 - 2014-09-15
, and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. ¶2 Smith first asserts that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60643 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.32(2) (2009-10)[1] and 939.05, and the order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60643 - 2011-03-02
to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.32(2) (2009-10)[1] and 939.05, and the order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60643 - 2011-03-02
Michael Cicero v. KAS of Madison, LLC
the garnishment action. ¶5 On November 19, 2002, Cicero filed a motion for an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7300 - 2005-03-31
the garnishment action. ¶5 On November 19, 2002, Cicero filed a motion for an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7300 - 2005-03-31