Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27211 - 27220 of 37054 for f h.
Search results 27211 - 27220 of 37054 for f h.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
“[i]f the motion raises sufficient facts that, if true, show that the defendant is entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948905 - 2025-04-30
“[i]f the motion raises sufficient facts that, if true, show that the defendant is entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948905 - 2025-04-30
State v. Kevin D. Russo
for Waukesha County: Michael O. Bohren and PAUL F. REILLY, Judges. Affirmed. Before Snyder, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26058 - 2006-08-01
for Waukesha County: Michael O. Bohren and PAUL F. REILLY, Judges. Affirmed. Before Snyder, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26058 - 2006-08-01
State v. Robert K.
permitted by Wis. Stat. § 48.422(2) (“[i]f the petition is contested the court shall set a date for a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7641 - 2005-03-31
permitted by Wis. Stat. § 48.422(2) (“[i]f the petition is contested the court shall set a date for a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7641 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143247 - 2015-06-17
] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143247 - 2015-06-17
State v. Dallas D. Lucas
judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2001-02). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7105 - 2005-03-31
judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2001-02). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7105 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2009-10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66905 - 2011-07-05
)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2009-10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66905 - 2011-07-05
State v. Enrique Vizcaino
“[I]f during a valid traffic stop, an officer becomes aware of suspicious factors or additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25988 - 2006-07-25
“[I]f during a valid traffic stop, an officer becomes aware of suspicious factors or additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25988 - 2006-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) and (3) (2009-10). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2009-10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82636 - 2012-05-16
. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) and (3) (2009-10). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2009-10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82636 - 2012-05-16
State v. Robert J. Brown
judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2001-02). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6841 - 2005-03-31
judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2001-02). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6841 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Chartis Specialty Insurance Company, sued as and f/k/a American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108751 - 2014-03-11
Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Chartis Specialty Insurance Company, sued as and f/k/a American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108751 - 2014-03-11