Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27211 - 27220 of 50556 for our.
Search results 27211 - 27220 of 50556 for our.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was ineffective in not pursuing certain claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91266 - 2014-09-15
was ineffective in not pursuing certain claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91266 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James W. Parlow v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
sought to “check one thing” and said that “it is our understanding that the — the reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19702 - 2017-09-21
sought to “check one thing” and said that “it is our understanding that the — the reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19702 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166453 - 2017-09-21
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166453 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). We agree with counsel that a challenge to Silverman’s sentences would lack arguable merit. 2 Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142448 - 2017-09-21
). We agree with counsel that a challenge to Silverman’s sentences would lack arguable merit. 2 Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142448 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135178 - 2015-02-12
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135178 - 2015-02-12
State v. Babette Davis
. From our review of the sentencing transcript, we conclude that the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31
. From our review of the sentencing transcript, we conclude that the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9236 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, there would be no arguable merit to a challenge to the sentencing court’s discretion. Our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297223 - 2020-10-20
, there would be no arguable merit to a challenge to the sentencing court’s discretion. Our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297223 - 2020-10-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
as to that order. ¶3 As discussed in our order dated April 16, 2007, Sturdevant’s appeal was timely from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32474 - 2014-09-15
as to that order. ¶3 As discussed in our order dated April 16, 2007, Sturdevant’s appeal was timely from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32474 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
report, response, a supplement report, and our own examination of the record, this court summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61048 - 2014-09-15
report, response, a supplement report, and our own examination of the record, this court summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61048 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Reginald Young
.2d ___, 532 N.W.2d 94 (1995). In Randall, our supreme court held that “it is not a denial of due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7703 - 2017-09-19
.2d ___, 532 N.W.2d 94 (1995). In Randall, our supreme court held that “it is not a denial of due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7703 - 2017-09-19