Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27221 - 27230 of 50556 for our.
Search results 27221 - 27230 of 50556 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673649 - 2023-06-29
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673649 - 2023-06-29
[PDF]
State v. Charles C. Patterson
that Patterson does not meet the threshold for commitment under WIS. STAT. ch. 980. This argument ignores our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26088 - 2017-09-21
that Patterson does not meet the threshold for commitment under WIS. STAT. ch. 980. This argument ignores our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26088 - 2017-09-21
William N. Ledford v. William Noland
” never becomes the final ICRS decision. The department appears to share our interpretation in its letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15683 - 2005-03-31
” never becomes the final ICRS decision. The department appears to share our interpretation in its letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15683 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Ware
in sentencing, our review is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11274 - 2005-03-31
in sentencing, our review is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11274 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI 17
of a referee had prevented the OLR from incurring any unnecessary costs. ¶7 Based upon our independent review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28043 - 2007-02-05
of a referee had prevented the OLR from incurring any unnecessary costs. ¶7 Based upon our independent review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28043 - 2007-02-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his sentence. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277918 - 2020-08-13
his sentence. Our review of the record discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277918 - 2020-08-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion or notice of appeal. Although not addressed in the no-merit report, our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599420 - 2022-12-14
motion or notice of appeal. Although not addressed in the no-merit report, our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599420 - 2022-12-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
alleged that the State breached the plea agreement at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159291 - 2017-09-21
alleged that the State breached the plea agreement at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159291 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 86, 90, 423 N.W.2d 533 (1988). There, our supreme court held that “no dual credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111030 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 86, 90, 423 N.W.2d 533 (1988). There, our supreme court held that “no dual credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111030 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
As discussed in our order dated April 16, 2007, Sturdevant’s appeal was timely from the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32474 - 2008-04-16
As discussed in our order dated April 16, 2007, Sturdevant’s appeal was timely from the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32474 - 2008-04-16