Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27231 - 27240 of 97761 for civil court case status online.

[PDF] Phillip Adam v. Brown County
status and collective bargaining agreement; (2) did the trial court make sufficient findings and does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11297 - 2017-09-19

Phillip Adam v. Brown County
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED July 22, 1997 NOTICE A party may file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11297 - 2005-03-31

David Paustenbach v. John Vishnevsky
in protracted litigation to avoid liquidation, the court found the case to be very undesirable and its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3145 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] David Paustenbach v. John Vishnevsky
a finding of civil or criminal contempt or a violation of a court or stipulated order. Circuit courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3145 - 2017-09-19

John Vishnevsky v. Dempsey
in protracted litigation to avoid liquidation, the court found the case to be very undesirable and its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2873 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John Vishnevsky v. Dempsey
a finding of civil or criminal contempt or a violation of a court or stipulated order. Circuit courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2873 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Ken Ehle v. Richard Detlor
a “Notice of Hearing” explaining that the case was set for “Court trial” on March 13, 1998, at 10:00 a.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13774 - 2014-09-15

Ken Ehle v. Richard Detlor
County, the court sent both parties a “Notice of Hearing” explaining that the case was set for “Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13774 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Frank Curiel
his right to trial by jury, and chose to have his case tried to the court. At the beginning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12454 - 2017-09-21

State v. Frank Curiel
of the State’s case; (2) there was insufficient evidence to support the circuit court’s order; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12454 - 2005-03-31