Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27231 - 27240 of 33987 for dismissed.
Search results 27231 - 27240 of 33987 for dismissed.
State v. Louis J. Thornton
for the dismissal of all repeater allegations and all but two unenhanced counts, one each of robbery by use of force
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3733 - 2005-03-31
for the dismissal of all repeater allegations and all but two unenhanced counts, one each of robbery by use of force
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3733 - 2005-03-31
Kevin Kirsch v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
judgment,[14] and remand with directions to dismiss the complaint. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15762 - 2005-03-31
judgment,[14] and remand with directions to dismiss the complaint. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15762 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 128
resulted in a hearing on the District’s motion for summary judgment and CIC’s motion to dismiss the third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53557 - 2014-09-15
resulted in a hearing on the District’s motion for summary judgment and CIC’s motion to dismiss the third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53557 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 163
filed three motions to dismiss the charge. Following a preliminary hearing held on July 31, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56883 - 2014-09-15
filed three motions to dismiss the charge. Following a preliminary hearing held on July 31, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56883 - 2014-09-15
Mark A. Sanders v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
for the State’s dismissal of the charge for possession of marijuana. The court then discussed the plea bargain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14731 - 2005-03-31
for the State’s dismissal of the charge for possession of marijuana. The court then discussed the plea bargain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14731 - 2005-03-31
Carla S. v. Frank B.
dismissed the appeal. ¶8 There is little difference between Wis. Stat. § 880.08 and Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16214 - 2005-03-31
dismissed the appeal. ¶8 There is little difference between Wis. Stat. § 880.08 and Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16214 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the requirements of law.”), Lilek pled no contest to sexual assault and aggravated battery, and the State dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104034 - 2013-11-12
to the requirements of law.”), Lilek pled no contest to sexual assault and aggravated battery, and the State dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104034 - 2013-11-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for dismissal of the charge at the end of a twelve-month period. CCAP records reflect that Phillips fulfilled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169748 - 2017-09-21
for dismissal of the charge at the end of a twelve-month period. CCAP records reflect that Phillips fulfilled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169748 - 2017-09-21
Mary Garvin v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
for the State’s dismissal of the charge for possession of marijuana. The court then discussed the plea bargain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14521 - 2005-03-31
for the State’s dismissal of the charge for possession of marijuana. The court then discussed the plea bargain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14521 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). We dismissed the appeal as premature because Nero was found guilty by a jury, the jury had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968499 - 2025-06-10
). We dismissed the appeal as premature because Nero was found guilty by a jury, the jury had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968499 - 2025-06-10