Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27231 - 27240 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 27231 - 27240 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
State v. Matthew J. Harvey
.2d 1 (1992). The test for probable cause is whether a believable or plausible account allows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8712 - 2017-09-19
.2d 1 (1992). The test for probable cause is whether a believable or plausible account allows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8712 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to a preliminary breath test (PBT).2 After a hearing on the matter, the circuit court denied the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854766 - 2024-10-02
to a preliminary breath test (PBT).2 After a hearing on the matter, the circuit court denied the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854766 - 2024-10-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Monti S. (visitation, Monti S.’s conditions of return, and DNA testing). Monti S. has not appealed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107222 - 2017-09-21
, Monti S. (visitation, Monti S.’s conditions of return, and DNA testing). Monti S. has not appealed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107222 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was a seasoned driver who could drive well while under the influence. Yealey failed a field sobriety test
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108208 - 2017-09-21
was a seasoned driver who could drive well while under the influence. Yealey failed a field sobriety test
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108208 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Choice W. E.
is not the statutory test. Section 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9276 - 2017-09-19
is not the statutory test. Section 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9276 - 2017-09-19
David A. Schlemm v. Matthew Frank
there was sufficient evidence of guilt. On certiorari review, we apply the substantial evidence test, that is, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19277 - 2005-08-10
there was sufficient evidence of guilt. On certiorari review, we apply the substantial evidence test, that is, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19277 - 2005-08-10
Lynelle V. Butkus v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
and the use of a discogram. The defense expert attacked the validity of this test, stating that it could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13097 - 2005-03-31
and the use of a discogram. The defense expert attacked the validity of this test, stating that it could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13097 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 227.57(6); Currie, 210 Wis. 2d at 387. The substantial evidence test does not require a preponderance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205693 - 2017-12-12
. § 227.57(6); Currie, 210 Wis. 2d at 387. The substantial evidence test does not require a preponderance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205693 - 2017-12-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
. However, that finding is not relevant. The test for deficient performance is an objective one that asks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35444 - 2014-09-15
. However, that finding is not relevant. The test for deficient performance is an objective one that asks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35444 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ollie B. Smith
validity of the extension is tested in the same manner, and under the same criteria, as the initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3026 - 2005-03-31
validity of the extension is tested in the same manner, and under the same criteria, as the initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3026 - 2005-03-31