Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27251 - 27260 of 30066 for de.
Search results 27251 - 27260 of 30066 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant to relief” is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion raises such facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982381 - 2025-07-15
the defendant to relief” is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion raises such facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982381 - 2025-07-15
[PDF]
State v. Dean Garfoot
(1985). Our review of the trial court's ruling is therefore de novo. We nevertheless decline to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7956 - 2017-09-19
(1985). Our review of the trial court's ruling is therefore de novo. We nevertheless decline to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7956 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the hearing notices constituted a de facto designation of the persons who were entitled to notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068407 - 2026-01-27
of the hearing notices constituted a de facto designation of the persons who were entitled to notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068407 - 2026-01-27
State v. Paul D. Hoppe
of the constitutional standard to historical facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2802 - 2005-03-31
of the constitutional standard to historical facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2802 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶26 If we conclude the defendant has not proved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83298 - 2012-06-06
de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶26 If we conclude the defendant has not proved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83298 - 2012-06-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121319 - 2014-09-15
review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121319 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Dodson
to a speedy trial is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4941 - 2017-09-19
to a speedy trial is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4941 - 2017-09-19
State v. Christopher Swiams
to facts that are not in dispute. Thus, our review is de novo. See State v. Wilson, 170 Wis. 2d 720, 722
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7279 - 2005-03-31
to facts that are not in dispute. Thus, our review is de novo. See State v. Wilson, 170 Wis. 2d 720, 722
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7279 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rhonda Neff v. James Pierzina
the issue de novo.4 III. ANALYSIS A. General Principles ¶29 An insured is required to give
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17508 - 2017-09-21
the issue de novo.4 III. ANALYSIS A. General Principles ¶29 An insured is required to give
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17508 - 2017-09-21
Glen Basken v. Richard Bechtel
a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Sinks, 168 Wis.2d 245, 257, 483 N.W.2d 286, 291 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9635 - 2005-03-31
a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Sinks, 168 Wis.2d 245, 257, 483 N.W.2d 286, 291 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9635 - 2005-03-31