Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27261 - 27270 of 69191 for as he.
Search results 27261 - 27270 of 69191 for as he.
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Clarence Givens appeals from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37302 - 2009-07-14
CURIAM. Clarence Givens appeals from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37302 - 2009-07-14
State v. Brady B.
he was denied equal protection of the law when he was prosecuted while the female who willingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14191 - 2005-03-31
he was denied equal protection of the law when he was prosecuted while the female who willingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14191 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2019-20).1 He argues: (1) the police conducted a post-arrest lineup
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449421 - 2021-11-09
to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2019-20).1 He argues: (1) the police conducted a post-arrest lineup
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=449421 - 2021-11-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) the “new factor” that he recanted his trial testimony claiming innocence and now admits that he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183443 - 2017-09-21
) the “new factor” that he recanted his trial testimony claiming innocence and now admits that he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183443 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kory J. Malcheski
on the ground that he had refused to submit to a chemical test pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 343.305, the implied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5532 - 2005-03-31
on the ground that he had refused to submit to a chemical test pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 343.305, the implied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5532 - 2005-03-31
Robert Keith v. Joshuah C. Harner
in construing the “strict compliance” clause of § 893.82(2m).[2] He argues that his actions were within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7274 - 2005-03-31
in construing the “strict compliance” clause of § 893.82(2m).[2] He argues that his actions were within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7274 - 2005-03-31
Rule Order
of pending disciplinary investigations. He advised the court that of the several hundred new grievances
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115410 - 2014-06-23
of pending disciplinary investigations. He advised the court that of the several hundred new grievances
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115410 - 2014-06-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. He argues: (1) that he is entitled to resentencing because the circuit court treated a sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96439 - 2013-05-06
. He argues: (1) that he is entitled to resentencing because the circuit court treated a sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96439 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
State v. Dan E. Holman
to WIS. STAT. § 946.49(1)(a) (1999-2000). 2 He claims that the bail condition imposed violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4341 - 2017-09-19
to WIS. STAT. § 946.49(1)(a) (1999-2000). 2 He claims that the bail condition imposed violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4341 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
penalties and the constitutional rights he waived by pleading no contest. Winarski personally confirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92170 - 2013-01-28
penalties and the constitutional rights he waived by pleading no contest. Winarski personally confirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92170 - 2013-01-28