Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27261 - 27270 of 30059 for de.
Search results 27261 - 27270 of 30059 for de.
State v. Jeannie M. P.
performance was deficient or prejudicial are legal questions we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18686 - 2005-08-30
performance was deficient or prejudicial are legal questions we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18686 - 2005-08-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121319 - 2014-09-15
review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121319 - 2014-09-15
Rhonda Miller v. Craig J. Thomack
judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9275 - 2005-03-31
judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9275 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Dodson
to a speedy trial is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4941 - 2017-09-19
to a speedy trial is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4941 - 2017-09-19
State v. Town of Linn
judgment presents a question of law which we review de novo, we still value a trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10004 - 2005-03-31
judgment presents a question of law which we review de novo, we still value a trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10004 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a legal issue subject to de novo review.” Id. ¶9 “On review, the language of a jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210821 - 2018-04-10
is a legal issue subject to de novo review.” Id. ¶9 “On review, the language of a jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210821 - 2018-04-10
State v. Christopher Swiams
to facts that are not in dispute. Thus, our review is de novo. See State v. Wilson, 170 Wis. 2d 720, 722
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7279 - 2005-03-31
to facts that are not in dispute. Thus, our review is de novo. See State v. Wilson, 170 Wis. 2d 720, 722
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7279 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Heidi Frisch v. Ronald J. Henrichs
. 2d 596, 671 N.W.2d 304. We review questions of law de novo. Id., ¶16. B. Contempt ¶23 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21591 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 596, 671 N.W.2d 304. We review questions of law de novo. Id., ¶16. B. Contempt ¶23 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21591 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Rhonda Neff v. James Pierzina
the issue de novo.4 III. ANALYSIS A. General Principles ¶29 An insured is required to give
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17508 - 2017-09-21
the issue de novo.4 III. ANALYSIS A. General Principles ¶29 An insured is required to give
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17508 - 2017-09-21
Glen Basken v. Richard Bechtel
a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Sinks, 168 Wis.2d 245, 257, 483 N.W.2d 286, 291 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9635 - 2005-03-31
a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Sinks, 168 Wis.2d 245, 257, 483 N.W.2d 286, 291 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9635 - 2005-03-31