Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27261 - 27270 of 29823 for des.
Search results 27261 - 27270 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. John L. Griffin
or seizure passes constitutional muster, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review.” See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12292 - 2017-09-21
or seizure passes constitutional muster, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review.” See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12292 - 2017-09-21
Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
. Stat. § 7.50(2)(c).[14] This court reviews the legal conclusions of such a board de novo. Bar
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16599 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 7.50(2)(c).[14] This court reviews the legal conclusions of such a board de novo. Bar
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16599 - 2005-03-31
Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church and School-Freistadt v. Tower Insurance Company
of the jury. Jacque, 209 Wis. 2d at 626. However, we apply a de novo standard of review when passing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3925 - 2005-03-31
of the jury. Jacque, 209 Wis. 2d at 626. However, we apply a de novo standard of review when passing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3925 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for judgment notwithstanding the verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the [circuit] court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169839 - 2017-09-21
for judgment notwithstanding the verdict de novo, applying the same standards as the [circuit] court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169839 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Koeppen
of a prior conviction must be a direct and specific admission by the defendant). We apply a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15136 - 2017-09-21
of a prior conviction must be a direct and specific admission by the defendant). We apply a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15136 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Leon M. Reyes v. Greatway Insurance Company
reviews de novo. State v. Bodoh, No. 97-0495-CR, op. at 4 (S. Ct. June 18, 1999); Manor v. Hanson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17272 - 2017-09-21
reviews de novo. State v. Bodoh, No. 97-0495-CR, op. at 4 (S. Ct. June 18, 1999); Manor v. Hanson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17272 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas R. Ward v. Town of Nashville
(Ct. App. 1990) (implicitly applying de novo review to issue whether judgment was final), overruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2481 - 2017-09-19
(Ct. App. 1990) (implicitly applying de novo review to issue whether judgment was final), overruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2481 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
not discuss it further. II. Summary Judgment A. Legal Standard ¶15 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57081 - 2010-11-23
not discuss it further. II. Summary Judgment A. Legal Standard ¶15 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57081 - 2010-11-23
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Von Haden, Jr.
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7060 - 2017-09-20
which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification, however, presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7060 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation, for the sake of this particular argument we apply a de novo standard of review. See Seider v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894720 - 2024-12-26
interpretation, for the sake of this particular argument we apply a de novo standard of review. See Seider v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894720 - 2024-12-26