Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27261 - 27270 of 67827 for law.

May a full-time court commissioner serve for hire as a neutral third person?
authorized by law. The requestor argues that Wis. Stat. §802.12 constitutes an express
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=889 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
515 W. Moreland Blvd., Rm. 348 Waukesha, WI 53188 Michael J. Finn Finn Law Office 163 E. Capitol Dr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133448 - 2015-01-27

Reuben Adams v. Phil Macht
of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law. See Horton v. Haddow, 186 Wis.2d 174, 181, 519
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14931 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is reviewable by common law certiorari.” State ex rel. Britt v. Gamble, 2002 WI App 238, ¶15, 257 Wis. 2d 689
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160530 - 2017-09-21

2007 WI APP 155
was enforcing its criminal laws, not regulating hunting, and denied the motion. Jacobs then pled no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28876 - 2007-06-26

[PDF] _WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462637 - 2021-12-09

State v. Feliciano T. Douglas
is a question of fact that we review under the “clearly erroneous” test, and the latter is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5998 - 2005-03-31

Constance R. Smith v. Philip G. Smith
of circumstances presents a mixed question of fact and law. See Harris v. Harris, 141 Wis. 2d 569, 574, 415 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6901 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
factor is a question of law. Id., 333 Wis. 2d 53, ¶33. ¶3 Belle contends that a statutory change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94909 - 2014-09-15

State v. Bruce Lee Brown
is a question of law which may be decided without deference to the lower court’s determination; however, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18256 - 2005-05-23