Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27271 - 27280 of 64778 for b's.
Search results 27271 - 27280 of 64778 for b's.
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
, 943.201(2), 943.50(1m)(b), 939.05, 943.20(1)(d), and 939.32 (2001–2002).[1] She also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5455 - 2005-03-31
, 943.201(2), 943.50(1m)(b), 939.05, 943.20(1)(d), and 939.32 (2001–2002).[1] She also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5455 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
indicated that Hopkins was in possession of the gun. B. Shoes. ¶12 Hopkins next argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5146 - 2005-03-31
indicated that Hopkins was in possession of the gun. B. Shoes. ¶12 Hopkins next argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5146 - 2005-03-31
Walworth County DH&HS v. Dena D. C.
with directions. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19514 - 2005-09-06
with directions. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19514 - 2005-09-06
[PDF]
State v. Darla Rae Duchay
to No. 01-1631-CR 2 WIS. STAT. §§ 943.38(2) and 939.62(1)(b). 1 She also appeals the order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4085 - 2017-09-20
to No. 01-1631-CR 2 WIS. STAT. §§ 943.38(2) and 939.62(1)(b). 1 She also appeals the order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4085 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) and (b) tell us that in § 942.09 “nudity” and “nude or partially nude person” have the definitions set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138974 - 2017-09-21
) and (b) tell us that in § 942.09 “nudity” and “nude or partially nude person” have the definitions set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138974 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In the section below, I address his remaining arguments. B. Little’s Remaining Arguments ¶14 Little argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77156 - 2014-09-15
. In the section below, I address his remaining arguments. B. Little’s Remaining Arguments ¶14 Little argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77156 - 2014-09-15
Milwaukee County v. Louise M.
for the individual's treatment or protection available in the community under this subdivision. (b) The officer's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8577 - 2005-03-31
for the individual's treatment or protection available in the community under this subdivision. (b) The officer's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8577 - 2005-03-31
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
of one-half of the land in area within the territory. b. The owners of one-half of the real property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2816 - 2005-03-31
of one-half of the land in area within the territory. b. The owners of one-half of the real property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2816 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A.T.
id. ¶18 WISCONSIN STAT. § 938.33(1) provides that "[b]efore the disposition of a juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4634 - 2017-09-19
id. ¶18 WISCONSIN STAT. § 938.33(1) provides that "[b]efore the disposition of a juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4634 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a reasonable judge could reach and (b) consistent with applicable law, we will affirm the decision as a proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34289 - 2008-10-14
a reasonable judge could reach and (b) consistent with applicable law, we will affirm the decision as a proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34289 - 2008-10-14