Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27281 - 27290 of 29958 for de.
Search results 27281 - 27290 of 29958 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Koeppen
of a prior conviction must be a direct and specific admission by the defendant). We apply a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15136 - 2017-09-21
of a prior conviction must be a direct and specific admission by the defendant). We apply a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15136 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶25 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56357 - 2014-09-15
. ¶25 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56357 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. John L. Griffin
or seizure passes constitutional muster, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review.” See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12292 - 2017-09-21
or seizure passes constitutional muster, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review.” See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12292 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an evidentiary hearing, we review de novo “whether the motion on its face alleges sufficient material and non
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749246 - 2024-01-09
an evidentiary hearing, we review de novo “whether the motion on its face alleges sufficient material and non
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749246 - 2024-01-09
Jan Raz v. Mary Brown
motions. Raz and Brown filed motions for de novo review. ¶6 Raz filed a brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4368 - 2005-03-31
motions. Raz and Brown filed motions for de novo review. ¶6 Raz filed a brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4368 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeannie M. P.
, but whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial are legal questions we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18686 - 2017-09-21
, but whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial are legal questions we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18686 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 147
confirmation of the accuracy of what he told the officers was de minimis—the jury would have still heard what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72631 - 2014-09-15
confirmation of the accuracy of what he told the officers was de minimis—the jury would have still heard what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72631 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Susan M. Tennyson v. School District of the Menomonie Area
of law” that this court reviews de novo. Stern, 185 Wis.2d at 236, 517 N.W.2d at 664. Further, “[a]n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15264 - 2017-09-21
of law” that this court reviews de novo. Stern, 185 Wis.2d at 236, 517 N.W.2d at 664. Further, “[a]n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15264 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 169
but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56203 - 2014-09-15
but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56203 - 2014-09-15
Wi app 8 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP351 Complete Title of C...
and application of § 100.18 is a question of law that we review de novo. See Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131917 - 2015-03-11
and application of § 100.18 is a question of law that we review de novo. See Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131917 - 2015-03-11